Assignment Examples Across Disciplines
↑ Back to Beyond AI‑Proofing: Designing for Integrity, Fluency, and the Future of Liberal Arts Learning
📚 Jump to Strategy Examples:
Medium Shift & Performance •
Oral/Adaptive Assessment •
Reflective Loop •
Authenticity Cascade •
Context Locking •
Grounded Experience •
Fewer Assignments, Deeper Rigor •
Minimal Viable Redesign •
Stop-Doing List
🎙️ Medium Shift & Performance
What It Is: Changing the mode of expression from traditional written assignments to multimodal formats—podcasts, video essays, live presentations, recorded demonstrations—that develop technological literacy while making learning observable and human.
Strength: Invites new forms of thinking; teaches multimedia communication skills; makes learning performative and impossible to outsource; builds confidence through iterative practice.
Hidden Weakness: Raises accessibility and support demands; needs scaffolding for tool use; some students may have limited access to recording technology.
Student Experience: Can unlock hidden strengths and build professional communication skills; may create initial anxiety for students unfamiliar with production tools but grows confidence with practice.
Examples in Practice
📘 Biology – Video Lab Explanation
Instead of a traditional lab report, create a 6-8 minute video explaining your enzyme kinetics experiment. Include: a visual demonstration of your setup, narration of your methodology, a brief interview segment with your lab partner discussing unexpected results, and a concluding reflection on what this format revealed that writing alone couldn’t capture. Practice your explanation in class during peer review sessions.
📘 Philosophy – Ethical Argument Presentation
Develop a 10-minute presentation on your semester-long ethical case study. Present to the class with visual aids (slides, props, or concept maps). Classmates will pose follow-up questions testing your reasoning. After presenting, submit a 2-minute video reflection on what the Q&A revealed about gaps in your argument. Students practice presentations in small groups first, receiving peer feedback before the formal presentation.
📘 History – Documentary-Style Essay
Create a 5-7 minute documentary-style video essay on a historical turning point. Incorporate primary source images, your own narration, text overlays for key quotes, and background music that reinforces your argument’s tone. Submit both the video and a 250-word “director’s statement” explaining your editorial choices. Students workshop rough cuts in peer review sessions.
📘 Literature – Close Reading Performance
Record a 4-minute “close reading performance” where you walk through a single passage, explaining literary devices, thematic connections, and interpretive choices. Use screen recording to highlight specific words/phrases while you narrate. Present initial readings to small groups for feedback before final submission.
📘 Environmental Science – Infographic + Pitch
Create an infographic visualizing climate data, then deliver a 5-minute “pitch” to the class explaining your design choices, what the data reveals, and why it matters. Field questions from classmates about methodology and interpretation. Students iterate through multiple draft versions based on peer critique.
📘 Education – Lesson Demonstration
Design and teach a 10-minute micro-lesson on a concept from your discipline to your peers. Record the lesson, then create a 3-minute reflective video analyzing what worked, what didn’t, and how you’d revise. Practice teaching in small groups before presenting to the full class.
💬 Oral/Adaptive Assessment
What It Is: Assessing understanding through live dialogue, presentations with Q&A, conversational check-ins, and adaptive questioning that reveals depth of thinking in real time.
Strength: Reveals authentic understanding through dialogue; builds improvisational thinking and professional communication skills; impossible to outsource; humanizes the assessment process.
Hidden Weakness: Can create anxiety if not framed with empathy and trust; requires significant faculty time for individual conversations; may disadvantage students with speech/language challenges without accommodations.
Student Experience: Humanizing and coaching-oriented when done well; intimidating if positioned as “gotcha” verification. Builds confidence in speaking about ideas under light pressure.
Examples in Practice
📘 Computer Science – Code Walk-Through
After submitting your program, sign up for a 10-minute conversation during office hours. Walk me through your logic for one key function, explain your design choices, and make a small modification on the spot while thinking aloud. This is low-stakes coaching—I’m interested in your reasoning process, not perfection. Students practice explaining code to partners before the conversation.
📘 Literature – Essay Conference
Bring your essay to our scheduled 15-minute conference. Be ready to: read one paragraph aloud and explain your word choices, identify the moment your argument crystallized while writing, and discuss one claim you’re still wrestling with. This is conversational—the dialogue itself isn’t graded, but it informs my understanding of your thinking.
📘 Psychology – Research Design Defense
Present your research proposal to me and two classmates in a 20-minute session. After your 7-minute overview, we’ll ask clarifying questions about your methodology, ethical considerations, and theoretical framework. Students practice defending proposals in small groups before formal sessions.
📘 Foreign Language – Impromptu Discussion
In our scheduled 8-minute conversation, I’ll give you a prompt related to course themes (revealed at the start of our meeting). Speak for 3-4 minutes, then we’ll have a natural dialogue. This assesses your ability to think in the language, not recite memorized speeches. Students practice impromptu speaking in rotating partner conversations.
📘 Studio Art – Critique Presentation
Present your work-in-progress to the class, explaining your concept, process, and challenges. Field questions and suggestions from peers. This isn’t about defending perfection—it’s about articulating your thinking and remaining open to dialogue. Practice presenting work at multiple stages throughout the semester.
📘 Economics – Policy Analysis Discussion
During our 12-minute conversation, explain your policy recommendation as if I’m a skeptical city council member. I’ll challenge your assumptions and data. Your job is to respond thoughtfully, acknowledge valid critiques, and clarify your reasoning. Students role-play these scenarios in pairs before individual assessments.
🔁 Reflective Loop
What It Is: Multi-stage assignment design where students return to their work repeatedly, documenting how their thinking evolves through drafts, peer feedback, and instructor guidance.
Strength: Makes shallow AI work collapse under its own weight; builds metacognition; demonstrates learning as process rather than product.
Hidden Weakness: Requires time and iterative grading support; can increase faculty workload; may feel overwhelming to students without clear milestone feedback.
Student Experience: Builds genuine metacognition and revision skills; can feel overwhelming without structured checkpoints and encouragement.
Examples in Practice
📘 Writing Seminar – Argument Evolution
Week 3: Submit a project proposal (1 page) identifying your question and initial thinking.
Week 6: Expand into an annotated outline showing three potential arguments. Explain which direction you’re leaning toward and why.
Week 10: Draft your full essay building directly from your outline. Bring draft to peer review workshop.
Week 14: Final essay must include a reflective cover letter tracing how your argument evolved from proposal to final draft, citing specific feedback that shifted your thinking.
📘 Biology – Literature Review Process
Phase 1: Use AI to generate a preliminary literature review on your research topic (3 pages). Submit the AI output with your prompt.
Phase 2: Verify every citation. Identify what the AI got wrong, misrepresented, or fabricated. Document errors in a tracking spreadsheet.
Phase 3: Revise the review using actual sources. Present findings to small group, explaining what you learned about AI’s limitations.
Phase 4: Write a 2-page reflection on how this process changed your understanding of source evaluation and AI as a research tool.
📘 Philosophy – Argument Workshop Series
Week 2: Write a 300-word position on an ethical dilemma.
Week 5: After studying three theoretical frameworks, revise your position with proper philosophical citations. Mark what changed from your original position.
Week 9: Incorporate counter-arguments and peer critique. Use comment features to show what feedback you integrated and why.
Week 13: Final paper includes an annotated “evolution of thinking” appendix showing what shifted at each stage and which moments of feedback proved most valuable.
📘 Education – Lesson Design Iteration
Draft 1: Design a lesson plan for a target concept.
Peer Review: Teach a 5-minute excerpt to small group; receive feedback on clarity and engagement.
Draft 2: Revise based on feedback; submit written reflection on specific changes made.
Final Version: Teach revised lesson to class; record it; analyze your teaching in a video reflection comparing your initial plan to the actual implementation.
🎨 Authenticity Cascade
What It Is: Layering multiple interconnected phases of engagement—encounter, dialogue, synthesis, reflection—across a semester so that each stage builds authentically on previous work, making it impossible to fabricate the process.
Strength: Creates deep, sustained engagement; documents learning as journey; extremely difficult to fake through AI.
Hidden Weakness: Complex to design and coordinate effectively; requires careful scaffolding and timeline management.
Student Experience: Highly engaging and memorable but requires clear milestones; can feel overwhelming if checkpoints aren’t well-paced.
Examples in Practice
📘 Art History – Museum Evolution Project
Week 2: Visit a local museum. Choose one artwork. Photograph it. Write 200 words on your immediate response.
Week 5: Interview a classmate about their artwork choice. Record or transcribe the conversation. Write 300 words on how the dialogue shifted your perspective.
Week 9: Create a visual concept map connecting your artwork to three course readings on aesthetics and cultural context.
Week 14: Return to the museum. Create a 4-minute video essay at the artwork’s location, reflecting on how your understanding evolved from first encounter to now. Reference your earlier written responses in your narration.
📘 Sociology – Community Engagement Cascade
Phase 1: Attend a community meeting (city council, school board, neighborhood association). Take handwritten notes. Submit 1-page observation.
Phase 2: Interview someone you met at the meeting about their perspective on the issue discussed. Submit interview transcript and 2-page analysis.
Phase 3: Research the historical context of the issue. Present findings to small group, incorporating your interview insights.
Phase 4: Develop a policy recommendation grounded in your direct observation, interview data, and theoretical frameworks. Present to class with Q&A.
📘 Business – Local Enterprise Study
Phase 1: Select and visit a local business. Conduct an informational interview with owner/manager. Submit interview notes and initial SWOT analysis.
Phase 2: Apply course frameworks to analyze the business model. Present preliminary findings to peer review group.
Phase 3: Return to the business with clarifying questions based on peer feedback. Gather additional data.
Phase 4: Create a presentation of strategic recommendations. Present to class, then share key insights with the business owner. Write final reflection on the gap between theory and practice based on owner’s response.
🔒 Context Locking
What It Is: Grounding assignments in specific, local, time-bound, or lived realities that AI cannot fabricate—a particular class discussion, a campus event, a field experience with verifiable details, or personally documented observations.
Strength: Anchors learning in authentic context; AI cannot generate plausible fabrications of specific experiences.
Hidden Weakness: May disadvantage students without access to certain experiences; requires flexibility for students with scheduling conflicts or accessibility needs.
Student Experience: Deepens connection to place and community; can feel exclusionary to remote or commuter students if not designed thoughtfully.
Examples in Practice
📘 Environmental Science – Field Data Analysis
Analyze the water quality data you collected during our October field trip to the local watershed. Reference the three specific testing stations your group visited (include GPS coordinates or site names). Compare your measurements with the historical data from the college archive. Include photos of your group’s testing setup with visible landmarks. Explain any anomalies in your data based on weather conditions that day.
📘 Political Science – Class Discussion Reflection
Using the handwritten notes you took during Tuesday’s in-class debate on healthcare policy, identify three specific moments when your position shifted or was challenged. Reference particular arguments made by classmates (with their permission) and connect these moments to specific passages in this week’s readings (cite page numbers). Your notes will be part of your submission.
📘 Theater – Performance Analysis
Attend the campus theater production of [specific show] on one of three designated evenings. Take notes during the performance on your program. Write an analysis referencing specific staging choices, actor interpretations, and audience reactions you observed. Include your ticket stub and annotated program as appendices.
📘 Anthropology – Participant Observation
Spend 90 minutes at a specific campus location during a designated time window (e.g., the dining hall during Tuesday dinner service). Take detailed fieldnotes using the observation protocol we practiced in class. Your analysis must reference specific interactions, overheard conversations (anonymized), and spatial arrangements you documented. Submit your handwritten fieldnotes alongside your typed analysis.
🌍 Grounded Experience
What It Is: Making the physical world itself part of the learning process—direct observation, place-based inquiry, embodied knowledge—where “the world is your citation” and learning happens through authentic encounter with spaces, communities, and materials.
Strength: Creates memorable, embodied learning; develops observational and ethnographic skills; cannot be replicated by AI.
Hidden Weakness: Logistically challenging in large classes; requires careful attention to accessibility; not all students have equal mobility or transportation access.
Student Experience: Often the most memorable assignments of the semester; accessibility considerations are essential for equitable design.
Examples in Practice
📘 Sociology – Public Space Ethnography
Visit three different types of public spaces in your community (e.g., library, coffee shop, park) during similar time periods. Sketch the spatial layout of each. Photograph your sketchbook pages with location/time stamps. Observe and document how people use these spaces, noting patterns of interaction, movement, and social behavior. Analyze how architectural and social design shape community interaction, using course concepts on public space and social capital. Submit: sketches, photos, observation log, and 4-page analysis.
📘 Geology – Rock Formation Documentation
Visit the designated field site with your lab group. Identify and photograph five distinct rock formations. For each, record GPS coordinates, sketch the formation in your field notebook, collect a sample (where permitted), and note surrounding geological context. Create a photo essay with annotations explaining the geological processes that created each formation. Include your field notebook pages showing on-site observations and hypotheses.
📘 Studio Art – Site-Specific Installation Proposal
Choose a specific campus location. Visit it at three different times of day. Photograph it, sketch it, measure it, observe how people move through it. Design a site-specific installation that responds to the space’s history, architecture, and social use. Present your proposal to the class with documentation of your site research. Explain how the physical site shaped your artistic choices.
📘 History – Cemetery Documentation Project
Visit a local historical cemetery. Select five graves from different time periods. Photograph each gravestone. Research the individuals using local historical archives. Create a visual timeline connecting these individual lives to broader historical events and community patterns. Present findings as a gallery walk where classmates tour your documentation. Reflect on what material culture reveals that written records cannot.
🎯 Fewer Assignments, Deeper Rigor
What It Is: Reducing the number of assignments while dramatically increasing the depth, complexity, and intellectual rigor of each—trading quantity for quality to allow sustained engagement with challenging work.
Strength: Reduces grading load while amplifying depth of engagement; allows time for substantive feedback and revision; rewards sustained thinking.
Hidden Weakness: Requires explicit rubrics and scaffolding to maintain clarity and fairness; high stakes per assignment can create anxiety.
Student Experience: Can feel liberating and intellectually satisfying when done well; may feel high-pressure if stakes per assignment become too heavy without adequate support.
Examples in Practice
📘 Philosophy – Semester-Long Ethical Case Study
Instead of: Five short response papers (500 words each), graded independently.
Design: One semester-long ethical case study (3000 words total) developed through scaffolded stages:
- Week 3: Case selection with initial ethical question (400 words)
- Week 6: Annotated bibliography of philosophical sources (600 words)
- Week 9: First draft with peer review workshop (1500 words)
- Week 12: Revised draft with instructor feedback conference
- Week 15: Final version with reflective memo on thinking evolution (200 words)
Each stage receives formative feedback. Final grade considers growth across the semester.
📘 Chemistry – Comprehensive Research Investigations
Instead of: Ten brief lab reports following prescribed procedures.
Design: Three comprehensive research investigations where students:
- Design their own research question and methodology
- Conduct experiments across multiple lab sessions
- Participate in peer critique of methodology (presentation format)
- Analyze data with statistical tools
- Write a full research paper with embedded lab notebook documentation
- Present findings to the class with Q&A
Each investigation builds greater independence and complexity.
📘 Literature – Author Deep Dive
Instead of: Weekly reading responses on different texts.
Design: One author study across the semester with progressive assignments:
- Early Semester: Select author and read three major works
- Mid-Semester: Present author biography and literary context to small group
- Late Semester: Write comparative analysis essay (2500 words)
- Final: Teach a 15-minute “seminar session” on one text to the class, leading discussion
Single author focus allows genuine expertise to develop.
🔄 Minimal Viable Redesign (MVR)
What It Is: Sustainable, incremental course redesign that starts with small, manageable changes to existing assignments and builds gradually over multiple semesters—avoiding faculty burnout while steadily improving course coherence.
Strength: Encourages sustainable evolution; reduces overwhelming redesign pressure; allows faculty to learn from each iteration before expanding changes.
Hidden Weakness: Easy to stall at pilot phase without broader curricular integration or departmental support; incremental changes may remain invisible to students.
Student Experience: Often invisible to students in the moment but improves overall course coherence and learning outcomes over time.
Examples in Practice
📘 History – Progressive Research Transparency
- Semester 1 (Current): Add one reflection question to existing research paper: “Document your research process—what search terms worked/failed, which sources proved most valuable, and how did your thesis evolve?”
- Semester 2: Require students to submit annotated research notes one week before the paper draft, showing source evaluation process.
- Semester 3: Add peer review session where students share research strategies and troubleshoot challenges together before writing begins.
Result: Same research paper assignment, but now with visible process, peer learning, and reduced plagiarism temptation.
📘 Mathematics – Problem-Solving Evolution
- Year 1: Add “show your work” narration requirement to existing problem sets—students explain their reasoning in words, not just symbols.
- Year 2: Introduce optional 2-minute video explanations of one challenging problem per week, offering bonus points.
- Year 3: Make video explanations required every other week; add peer review where students explain each other’s solution methods.
Result: Mathematical communication becomes central without abandoning problem sets.
📘 Psychology – Incremental Application Practice
- Current Semester: Add application examples to existing reading quizzes—students identify one real-world example of each concept.
- Next Semester: Replace multiple-choice quizzes with “concept photography”—students photograph something on campus that illustrates a concept and explain the connection (150 words).
- Following Semester: Add gallery walk where students present photos to peers and discuss varied interpretations of the same concept.
Result: More engaging, equally rigorous, less time to grade.
🗑️ Stop-Doing List
What It Is: Deliberately eliminating low-value, easily AI-generated tasks (like generic summaries or simple recall quizzes) to create space for more meaningful, authentic work that demonstrates higher-order thinking.
Strength: Clears space for deeper engagement; reduces both faculty grading burden and student busywork; focuses energy on assignments that matter.
Hidden Weakness: Risk of curricular incoherence if done without departmental coordination; students may resist if they’re habituated to low-stakes, low-effort work.
Student Experience: Liberating when aligned with clear learning goals and when students understand the rationale; can feel confusing or arbitrary if not well-explained.
Examples in Practice
📘 Political Science – From Summary to Inquiry
Eliminated: Weekly 500-word “summary of readings” discussion posts (easily AI-generated, low engagement).
Replaced With: Biweekly “critical question generator”—students craft one discussion question that connects multiple readings, then explain in 150 words why the question matters and what tensions it reveals. Questions become basis for class discussion.
Result: Students engage more authentically; faculty spend less time grading regurgitation; class discussions improve dramatically.
📘 Biology – From Quizzes to Application
Stopped: Chapter-end multiple-choice quizzes testing vocabulary and definitions.
Started: Weekly “concept in the wild”—students photograph something in their environment that illustrates a biological concept from readings, then explain the connection (100 words). Posts create a shared visual library.
Result: Students look for biology everywhere; more memorable learning; takes less time to assess.
📘 Literature – From Comprehension to Interpretation
Eliminated: Reading check quizzes proving students read the assignment (encourage skimming, easily gamed).
Replaced With: “Passage puzzles”—students bring one confusing/interesting passage to class, share in small groups why it matters, then propose interpretations together. Brief written reflection afterward (200 words).
Result: Rewards close reading; builds collaborative interpretation skills; more honest about reading struggles.
📘 Business – From Generic to Contextualized
Stopped: Generic case study responses using textbook frameworks (formulaic, easily AI-generated).
Started: Local business consultations—students apply frameworks to actual local businesses they’ve visited and interviewed, presenting findings to peers and occasionally to business owners.
Result: Learning becomes applied and accountable; students develop real consulting skills; community partnerships form.
These examples are starting points for adaptation across disciplines and institutional contexts. The most effective assignments emerge from faculty understanding of their students, learning goals, and disciplinary values—combined with willingness to experiment and iterate.