Why Work Still Feels Broken and What I’m Learning to Fix

Today, I tuned into an Alumni Learning Consortium webinar titled, Why Are We Here? Creating a Work Culture Everyone Wants, led by Jennifer Moss. Jennifer’s presentation was about her newest book, Why Are We Here: Creating a Work Culture Everyone Wants. It was packed with insights about burnout, trust, flexibility, and the deeper reasons so many people feel disconnected from their work. While the lecture format delivered a lot of information quickly, it also surfaced something deeper: how much we’ve normalized exhaustion since the pandemic and how hard it is to imagine a different rhythm.

This post is part reflection, part practice. I’ve been thinking about what resonated with me, and how I can apply it—not just as an idea, but as a leader trying to do things differently.

We are still stuck in a mode of pandemic-induced productivity obsession. Yes, we innovated and adapted quickly. But that speed came with consequences: burnout, detachment, time poverty, and a cultural valorization of being “always on.” Moss made the case that it is time to relearn the basics of how to behave like healthy humans at work.

That starts with a few uncomfortable truths. First, burnout is not a personal failure. It is a design flaw. A system problem. Leaders often drive burnout without realizing it, setting the tone, modeling urgency, never taking time off themselves. It is no wonder the rest of us follow their lead, right into chronic exhaustion.

Second, the old idea of work-life balance is no longer useful. Moss proposes something better: work-life harmony. A flexible, personal, purpose driven approach to how we spend our energy. Harmony does not mean equal time. It means intentionality. It means asking, Where does work fit into the goals of my life? not the other way around. After all, no one on their deathbed wishes they had checked more email at 6 a.m.

What stood out to me most was the framing of passion driven burnout. Moss distinguished between harmonious passion, where work energizes and coexists with life, and obsessive passion, where work controls us, making everything else feel secondary. That framing hit close to home. For many of us in mission driven roles, the danger is not disengagement. It’s over engagement without boundaries.

So what do we do? Moss suggests starting small and starting local. Pick one of the six root causes of burnout: unsustainable workload, lack of control, unfairness, lack of recognition, mismatch of skills and values, or social disconnection. Then ask yourself, Where can I push for clarity or change? Talk with your manager. Identify inefficiencies. Suggest shorter meetings. Focus on reducing stressors by just 5 percent this month.

She also reminds us that trust is the foundation of all healthy teams, and that it must be built through consistency, not charisma. Checking in, not checking up. Asking what someone needs, not just what they are doing. Creating rituals of transparency and feedback. Replacing exit interviews with stay interviews.

Perhaps the most future facing part of Moss’s talk was her handling of AI anxiety and ageism. With half of all workers expected to need re-skilling in the next two years, and intergenerational friction still strong in many organizations, she argued that peer mentorship and flattened learning hierarchies will be essential. Gen X, in particular, is often caught in a quiet struggle. They are promoted slower, caregiving more, and least likely to speak up. We need better models for leadership across generations, and clearer invitations to let everyone’s wisdom in.

This talk was not just about what we have lost. It was also a reminder of what we gained during the most surreal years of our lives. The moments of humor, of flexibility, of emotional honesty. Moss urged us not to forget what the pandemic revealed about our capacity to adapt, our hunger for meaning, and our ability to connect, even in chaos.

Workplace wellbeing will not be solved by perks or posters. It is built through trust, autonomy, and reflection—and by leaders and colleagues willing to ask (and re ask), Why are we here?


Practicing What She Preached: Questions for a Leader (and Those Who Hire Them)

After sitting with Moss’s message, I began thinking not just about culture, but about leadership at every level. This is not just about CEOs or campus presidents. It is about department chairs, project leads, IT directors, and anyone trying to foster trust while navigating complexity, burnout, and the push toward hybrid work.

If we are serious about building the kind of workplace Moss describes: flexible, purpose-driven, humane. It has to start with questions.

Below are two sets of questions I have begun using:
– One for myself, as a check-in tool to stay aligned
– One for hiring or mentoring senior leaders, especially CIOs, who often sit at the heart of systems change


Five Self-Reflection Questions 

When have I modeled vulnerability and transparency? How did my team respond?
Trust starts with visibility and imperfection.

How am I giving my colleagues autonomy and clarity, not just assignments?
Checking in, not checking up. It matters.

Where might I unintentionally be contributing to burnout? How can I reduce friction this month by 5 percent?
One meeting canceled. One unclear process improved. Small moves add up.

What hidden stressors are affecting me and others around me, and how do I make space to hear them?
Ask better questions. Listen without solving.

Am I managing up with the same honesty I ask of my team?
It is not just about leading down—it is about naming inefficiencies and clarifying priorities upward too.


Five Questions to Ask Any Human Centered Leader Like A CIO

Can you share a specific example of how you have led with empathy and self awareness during a high pressure project, especially when your team was under resourced or feeling burned out?
This reveals servant leadership under stress, not just tactical decision making.

How do you ensure that your IT strategy and operations are aligned with the broader goals and pressures faced by students, faculty, and staff—especially when everyone is being asked to do more with less?
Tests for vision and situational awareness.

Describe a time when you had to build up your team’s morale and sense of value in an environment where recognition, compensation, or resources were limited. What specific actions did you take?
Looks for creativity, values based leadership, and retention thinking.

How do you foster collaboration and open communication across departments, especially when you need buy in from stakeholders who may not initially support IT initiatives?
Evaluates cross silo influence and cultural fluency—core to 360 degree leadership.

When you feel insecure about your own knowledge or abilities, how do you model both vulnerability and assertiveness to your team?
This probes for humility, clarity, and the balance between transparency and guidance.


These two lists, one inward and one outward, are part of the same project: building workplaces that work for people.

Jennifer Moss reminded us that culture is not a product. It is a set of choices, repeated often, guided by questions like these. And the more we ask them—out loud, together—the closer we get to the kind of workplace everyone wants.

On the ephemera of web tools

So cool! Here we are in Feb 2024, and here’s a blog post that was never published. A rare find! Here’s the draft from whenever it was! Probably in the vicinity of 2012. 

A few years back, I came across a fabulous do-it-yourself animation tool called xtranormal. I’d totally forgotten I’d made this ages ago for free during the ‘MOOC hysteria,’ the specter of which is probably best captured by Alan Levine in one of his many posts titled just that.
In this animated MOOCup (mockup) interview I whipped up, Computer Science postdoc, Clark Cable, a graduate of MOOC College, discusses his credentials and badges during an inverview with hiring manager, Jane Joplin. He is literally shown the door with the limited gestures the freemium version of the software afforded at the time. 

One of my favorite authoring tools, Xtranormal has put its freemium plan rest. Adieu, fine tool. May some semblance of your original code live on forever in other droids. 

 

Reflections on the 2/14/24 AI Pedagogy Workshop and Project: metaLAB (at) Harvard

Today at the last minute, I was able to hop on a webinar over the noon hour with folks over at the Harvard metaLAB hosted by Sarah Newman. Maha Bali, who co-led the, “Learn With AI: 10 Ways to Try AI in Your Classroom Right Now,” webinar, helped facilitate and MC the event. I wasn’t familiar with the metaLAB, which describes itself as, “an idea foundry, knowledge-design lab, and production studio experimenting in the networked arts and humanities.” One of my student assistants majoring in Computer Science got to sit in on part of it during his shift so I’ll look forward to catching up with him when he’s back next time.

The purpose of the meeting was two-fold: a) introduce the AI Pedagogy Project website and the story about its development; b) provide breakout rooms for folks from all over the world to network and discuss some questions. Some screenshots will follow in this post.

Built mostly by Harvard students to deliver non-technical materials to explain many things about generative AI, the AI Pedagogy Project is a curated collection of crowdsourced assignments which I highly recommend taking a look at. You can even upload your own!  Sarah did a great job explaining the inclusive values at the heart of the project which, paraphrasing her, aims to break down the sometimes inherent gatekeeping that technical experts have about AI. Sarah and her team want to make AI as accessible and transparent as possible and mitigate the alarmist narrative in the media.

In the breakout room to which I was randomly assigned, I met a librarian from USC and a professor from the University of Winnipeg. We were given these prompts:

It was only 7 minutes but I think we got through this pretty quickly because there were only 3 of us. There were 202 people on the call.

There was a poll from which I’ll share some screenshot highlights. (Pro-tip: Click on the images to make them bigger so you don’t have to squint especially if you are reading this on your mobile device!)

Regarding the AI Pedagogy Project website,

What is a metaphor for AI you would use?

They read some of these out loud as they trickled in. They got progressively wittier (at least those Sarah and Maha read out loud musing). After Sarah read, “Frankenstein” out loud, I simply couldn’t resist and typed in my answer, “Nice Narcissus.” OMG, Sarah read that one out loud as well and I sure was glad it was anonymous! < digital blush >

Here are a few good ones. These crowdsourced polls are awesome! Nice to know I am not ALONE to ponder and make sense of this stuff!

I enjoyed the networking and learning about the AI Pedagogy Project and website. What a cool open educational resource!

 

Reflections on the 2/12/24 webinar: Learn With AI: 10 Ways to Try AI in Your Classroom Right Now

I attended a fantastic webinar this morning at 8:30 AM, Learn With AI: 10 Ways to Try AI in Your Classroom Right now,  co-hosted by Maha Bali at the American University in Cairo and Jon Ippolito at the University of Maine. Jon has a comprehensive site, Learn with AI, which is pretty impressive and well worth a looksie.

A recording of the webinar will be made available which I’ll try to remember to post if/when I have the link.  Maha is generally excellent at following up on what she promises by making such professional development opportunities available as open education resources. The webinar over Zoom was a 20 minute or so lecture by Jon followed by 20 minutes of a breakout room with educators who got to select an activity from wide-ranging topics. And then, each group submitted their work for further analysis and research by Maha and Jon. Lots of folks on the call so no doubt there were a number of submissions. I selected the Literature breakout room and worked with an education professor (also interested in this topic) from a university in the the Middle East.

After coming up with a plan and following the group activity outlined in the document’s instructions (shared in the above link to the workshop), we worked with prompts to build an assignment for a 10th grade English teacher to introduce Charles Dickens’, A Tale of Two Cities, to students. After the teacher introduces 15-20 minutes of lecture about the novel and its author, students are asked pair up to draft an outline ultimately leading to the creation a 5 slide presentation using two quotes from Dickens’ novel that resonate with them. I won’t paste the lengthy engagement with GPT but here’s the final product we submitted. Jon and Maha will then use the data and share back what they are working on with crowdsourced input from teachers.  It’s the first time I’ve used GPT in a live call in a breakout room with another educator whom I don’t know.

PROMPT:
From #4 on this most current list we are making together, “Generate Ideas: Brainstorm” and jot down all ideas that come to mind from the activity. Don’t filter yet; the goal is to have a range of ideas to work with, have students find 2 quotes from the text. They prepare 5 slides. last two slides have the quote on each slide. Make a very clear execution plan for students to follow.
GPT REPLY: For the activity where students are generating ideas and incorporating quotes from “A Tale of Two Cities” into their presentation, here’s a step-by-step breakdown for creating the slides:

Slide Creation Instructions for Students:

1. Brainstorming:

    • With your partner, brainstorm and list down as many ideas as you can, drawing inspiration from the activity you have chosen.
    • Look for themes, characters, conflicts, and historical contexts within “A Tale of Two Cities” that resonate with your brainstormed ideas.

2. Selecting Quotes:

    • From your brainstorming session, identify two key themes or elements that stand out.
    • Find two compelling quotes from “A Tale of Two Cities” that best represent these themes or elements.

3. Slide Outline:

    • Slide 1: Introduction slide with the presentation title, your names, and a brief overview or hook to engage the audience.
    • Slide 2: Context slide where you provide background information about “A Tale of Two Cities,” its setting, and the relevance of your chosen themes.
    • Slide 3: Discussion slide where you start delving into the first theme or element, leading up to the first quote.
    • Slide 4: Quote slide that features your first selected quote. Include a relevant image or background to set the tone and visually represent the theme.
    • Slide 5: Quote slide that features your second selected quote. Similarly, add a thematic background and perhaps a short explanation or question that will prompt audience reflection.

4. Designing Slides:

    • Use a consistent and readable font and color scheme that fits the historical context of the presentation.
    • Add relevant images or illustrations that complement the text and enhance understanding.
    • Keep the slides uncluttered and visually appealing to maintain audience engagement.

5. Reviewing and Practicing:

    • Once the slides are created, review them together. Check for typos, alignment, and ensure that the quotes are accurately cited.
    • Practice presenting the slides to each other, ensuring a smooth transition between slides and a clear narrative that connects all the ideas and quotes together.

Example Quotes from “A Tale of Two Cities”:

For the purposes of demonstration, here are two quotes that students might choose:

    1. Quote for Slide 4:
      • “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness…”
        • This quote could be used to discuss the duality of the era and the contrasting conditions between London and Paris.
    2. Quote for Slide 5:
      • “I see a beautiful city and a brilliant people rising from this abyss…”
        • This quote could highlight the theme of resurrection and the transformative power of the human spirit.

By integrating these quotes into their presentations, students can provide a powerful narrative thread that ties their insights to Dickens’ original text and underscores their understanding of the novel’s enduring themes.

Wow, I find that pretty useful!
Then, we asked it to generate some images with DALLE. The Logo Creator app can crank out a visual, a logo of sorts, to brand the assignment. This can help students eventually make one of their own while at it! I pasted the above chat into DALLE and massaged it a few times.
Wow.
version 1
version 2
version 3
A few interesting things I noticed during the meeting. At one point, a chat came in about an AI assistant self-identifying as being present in the meeting and taking it all in… OtterPilot. I’d heard of it, but didn’t know what it really does. Fascinating how Maha politely ejected it. Check this out:

I wonder if as soon as OtterPilot is connected, it requires disclosing its presence as a condition of hooking up a Zoom meeting. Good question!

A few screenshots of Jon’s excellent presentation.

A tip on structing an effective prompt from a template. You can insert what’s relevant to your inquiry.

This activity below, Improve a portfolio, is a research question I have currently when when working with community members on building professional websites.

I could envision having colleagues using this kind of prompt to update their website’s look and appearance, (like I need to do) or using a similarly-structured templated prompt when first building a website. That’s something I’m really interested in for my work with the Think Tank this semester. We’re already prototyping a GPT design here in LEDS with two student assistants. More on that later. But for now, back to website redesign prompting..  I’ve been collaborating with Ryan Dowling ’24 on his professional website  for nearly two years. Ryan just custom-branded his site and has put the final touches on a major update. He’s just now sharing its link actively with prospective employers. In January, during one of our meetings, we invoked Gen AI to help think over his layout. I think it sparked some creativity for Ryan because, a week later, he majorly overhauled along “with a little help from our AI friends…”

Because I’m having so much fun, it’s time to wrap up this post.

I explored a few GPT in the “app store.” Riffing with line from a popular Beatles song, “I get by with a little help from my friends.” Bing images gave me this image.

I downloaded and uploaded to “GPT4 Logo Creator,” Ro the GPT invokes “DALLE.”

Logo creator rejects it stating it’s copyright material. It suggested I describe this prompt without the image. I did. And it returns this:

But I was perplexed by the copyright question, so I tried out a different GPT, Super Describe, which was fine with it. It took the image and generated this one. Wow. It produces impressive figures but totally gets text wrong! It would take more corrective prompting to fix this. But I had to Let It Be for now.

When Generative AI met Vision Pro

With generative AI sense-making happily consuming more of my time along with the almost overnight arrival of Apple’s VR headset after years of anticipation… anticipation be like
TT

I’m ready to hit this Blog project again for a bit. I’ve had a nice extended break. I’m back for a spell. Thanks for that silent nod of encouragement.

I normally don’t get excited about new devices but after trying out the Apple Vision Pro, I can see even in its first iteration, it’s a game-changer on many levels. Yep, it’s $. But it’s neither a gadget nor fad. I’ll hold off on any predictions for now except only to point out the timing of its release is not coincidental with generative AI making giant leaps and bounds at the same time. The world just needed Apple to give us a device and platform where it’s really going to take off. Ahem. Surely, I’m not alone to have noticed a perfect storm in the making.